side note: Amidst the agenda-driven ideological rants of Charles Krauthammer and the attempted positive spin of the Obama White House, who really knows how much, if any, tort reform will be included in the final healthcare bill?
The Obama White House puts to use the WhiteHouse.gov website — its blog — to rebuke columnist Charles Krauthammer by name for Krauthammer’s column, “Kill the bills. Do health reform right.” Krauthammer’s case included an argument for step-by-step measures, starting with tort reform:
This is money — the low-end estimate is about half a trillion per decade — wasted in two ways. Part is simply hemorrhaged into the legal system to benefit a few jackpot lawsuit winners and an army of extravagantly rich malpractice lawyers such as John Edwards….[snip]
In the 4,000-plus pages of the two bills, there is no tort reform. Indeed, the House bill actually penalizes states that dare “limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.” Why? Because, as Howard Dean has openly acknowledged, Democrats don’t want “to take on the trial lawyers.” What he didn’t say — he didn’t need to — is that they give millions to the Democrats for precisely this kind of protection.
The White House’s incoming communications director, Dan Pfeiffer, responds in a blog post, “Reality Check: Column Ignores Facts about Health Reform.” On tort reform, he writes:
President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum directing the Secretary of HHS to move forward with an initiative to give states and health systems the opportunity to apply for medical liability demonstration projects. Section 2531 of the House bill also includes a voluntary state incentive grants program to encourage states to develop alternatives to traditional malpractice litigation.
Yep. And the Senate bill includes a “sense of the Senate” statement expressing some support for state demonstration projects. The legislative provisions and the Administration’s $25 million HHS grant program are the bare minimum needed to claim, “There is TOO tort reform in there.”
(more…)
